Does METRO2 Work on legal debts?

Should NOT be a factor cause reporting is a CONDITIONAL PRIVILEGE and the conditions include amongst other things ethicalness and compliance , each surely fractured if an entity went after you for exercising your consumer RIGHT TO CONTEST THEIR PRIVILEGE TO REPORT CHALLENGING THEM TO DEMONSTRATE DOCUMENT PROOF CONFIRMING CERTIFIABLY COMPLIANT REPORTING THAT INCLUDES PERFECT ADHERENCE TO THE MANDATORILY UTILIZED METRO 2 DATA-FILLED FIELD FORMATTED REPORTING STANDARDS FOR ETHICAL, LEGAL, COMPLIANT REPORTING. THIS IS BECAUSE ANY DEVIATION OF THESE STANDARDS JEOPARDIZES THE INTEGRITY OF THE DATA REPORTED THEREBY ELIMINATING POSSIBILITY REPORTER DID SO IN ACCORDANCE TO FEDERAL REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OF CLAIMS BEING MADE TO A MAXIMUM POSSIBLE ACCURACY AND MAXIMUM POSSIBLE COMPLETION, YET IF ANY DEVIATIONS OF THE STANDARD EXISTS OR CANT BE CERTIFIED DOES NOT EXIST, THE CRITERIA TO RETAIN THAT CONDITIONAL PRIVILEGE TO REPORT CAN NOT BE ASSUMED LEGITIMATE. NO REPORTER CAN REPORT DEFICIENT OF REQUISITES TO LAWFULLY REPORT, EVEN IF THEIR RIGHT TO COLLECT REMAINS DESPITE FORFEITURE OF REPORTING PRIVILEGES.

ARGUE IF OR NOT THE CLAIMER EVEN HAS CAPACITY TO LEGALLY SAY SOMETHING BEFORE ARGUING ABOUT WHAT THEY SAID, IMO AT LEAST!