NAA is most similar to wwrd except each letter has LESS ITEMS ATTACHED AND ALSO EACH CREDITOR (DF) WITH AN “ACCOUNT CONTAINING ANY NEGATIVITY IS ATTACKED, NOT ONLY IF ACCOUNT AS WHOLE IS NEGATIVE , BY DEFAULT. ADDITIONALLY, BY DEFAULT THE BIG THREE ARE ATTACKED AS WELL. كازينو حي
TSW, LEAST NUMBER OF LETTERS (JUST 3 TO MAIN BUREAUS ONLY) WITH MOST NUMBER OF ITEMS ATTACHED PER LETTER BEING ATTACKED. TSW DOES NOT, BY DEFAULT, ATTACK CREDITORS/Data Furnishers , but instead only Experian, Equifax, and Trans Union. الرهان على سباق الخيل Tsw is most efficient , but likely least effective Prodigy attack automation setup..
Wwrd is less efficient than tsw, but more efficient than is NAA with also ,by default the main 3 bureaus attacked but also UP TO TEN CREDITORS/ DFs. Wwrd has less items per letter than tsw but more items per letter than NAA. Wwrd is the “mid-child” attack setup between TSW and NAA. Wwrd is more efficient than NAA but likely less effective.
NAA is the everything attack, less efficient than either of other two above mentioned but equally very likely noticably more effective than either other attack setups too. الروليت اون لاين
Use tsw for most easy, most fast, most efficient attacks.
Use NAA for a most likely most EFFECTIVE attack setup.
Use wwrd if want lil of both, good efficiency and good effectiveness.