CRRG 3-4 “Any deviation of these standards JEOPARDIZES the integrity of the data”
15 U.S. Code 1681e- Compliance procedures, (b)
gives “…follow reasonable procedures to ASSURE maximum POSSIBLE ACCURACY of the information…”
The Credit Secret (Smart Money Secret) , FDCPA 807-8 aka Public Law 111-203, title X, 124 stat. 2092 (2010), section 807( 8) or 15 U.S. Code 1692, 807 (8)
“Communicating or threatening to communicate to any person credit information which is known or which should be known to be false , INCLUDING THE FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE THAT A DISPUTED DEBT IS DISPUTED”
[ WHICH IS EQUALLY LEVERAGE-ABLE READ AS
“….INCLUDING THE FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE A CONTESTED REPORTING IS CHALLEGED”
M2FPOC, point 1 “e-Oscar is a web-based METRO 2 COMPLIANT, automated system…”
M2FPOC, point 3 “….to the appropriate Data Furnisher based on the CRA and Subscriber…”
M2FPOC, Point 4 “The ACDV is returned to the initiating CRA with updated information…”
M2FPOC, point 5, 1st leverage point of ” If an account is modified or deleted, CARBON COPIES ARE SENT…”
M2FPOC, point 5, 2nd point of leverage
” …to EACH CRA with whom the DF has a reporting relationship”
These outline the Eight most important phrases or portion of phrases from which I developed the ORIGINAL METRO 2 COMPLIANCE METHOD of credit report enhancement ETHICALLY CONTESTING the Conditional Privilege to report for any information provider of consumer credit history.
Why dispute seeking errors that might not exist when compliant reporting is a requisite criteria to even report. Who cares what is “said” if can’t SATISFY conditions to even report ethically and or lawfully?
Contest the very conditional PRIVILEGE to report by challenging for the demonstrated document evidence that confirms alleging reporter is reporting in the required CERTIFIABLY compliant process, with full adherence to the MANDATORILY perfect and complete
Metro 2 data-filled fielded format for established reporting standards.