The initials NAA stands for new auto all…The NAA is the most “likely effective” yet least efficient attack within Prodigy’s original 2019 layout of attacks which also includes from most efficient to least else wise the Tsw attacks, the Wwrd attacks, the Peel attacks and the aforementioned NAA attacks. Travel backwards to go from most likely effective (less efficient) attacks towards most efficient (least likely effective).
The “more likely effective” or ” least likely effective” monikers is if you are considering any one particular regular prodigy attack as an individual attack not in conjunction with any others across 4+ waves/rounds/attack days….
If executing Prodigy attacks as is detailed as Prodigy Instructions ( way I do them, lol) then the “likelihood of effectiveness” of any one specific attack sort means NOTHING .
THAT IS BECAUSE ,BEING THAT PRODIGY’S ATTACKS ARE EACH, WITH MINIMAL EXCEPTIONS, UNIVERSALLY APPLICABLE AND COMBINED WITHIN A 4-ATTACK STRATEGIC PLAN, ANY 4 DIFFERING PRODIGY ATTACKS MOST CONSISTENTLY GARNER NEAR MIMICK END RESULTS , HENCE MY FAVORITISM FOR UTILIZATION OF THE MORE “EFFICIENT-FOCUSED” PRODIGY ATTACKS ( TSW, STSW, SPEEL1, PALS1 AS EXAMPLES) and only resort to the more effective-focused attacks if dire need arises ( such attacks include Pals4 , Pals3, Saaaf, snaa1, naa, and mdiy attacks”
All other attacks enjoy a fair level of comparative efficiency yet equally are also consistently effective moreso than earlier mentioned efficiency-focused attacks yet strikingly less consistently successful on a independent attack basis than is any of the also above-mentioned effective-focused attacks. For lack of previous categorical naming of these middle ground attacks , I’ma refer to them as the Medial Attacks aka the medials.
To save costs, go heavy on efficient-focused attacks,
To aim for increased early appearances of success, aim to lean more on the effective-focused attacks understanding these are rarely cheap or quick.
If you prefer a tad of effiency with fair to good consistency in regard to effectiveness as well, you’re gonna wanna lean your Prodigy 4-attack stratsgy towards the medials, at least initially (1st & 2nd attacks) then focus more towards efficiency if seeing good success thus far in first 2 attacks by time to execute 3rd attack ( for 35 day attack schedules, day #71 is 3rd attack day and first day of true report considerations)…
Alternatively, if seeing slow or no movement, its brst to transition towards a more effective-focused attack for Day71 attack#3.
If the review reveals luke warm success thus far , not great but not terrible either, it might be most wise to continue with the Medial attacks.
On day 106 for 4th attack, repeat same considerations made from way did on day #71 leading to decision for attack#3, but this being that Next attack. مراهنات كرة قدم Go efficient if goals are met or nearly so, because its easiest and cheapest execution at this point. العاب سلوتس
If very concerned even disappointed at potential of meeting goals on time, maybe aim towards the more effective-focused attacks understanding greater work, time and costs are undoubtedly involved doing so.
If OK not saddened nor excited with results thus far, and your “ok” staying with the current status quo, then the Medials might be you choice of favor?
then as always, regardless of attack chosen, wait 45 days after attack 4 sent out, fully evaluate for overall 4 attack success or failure based on your own criteria , goals, and reasonable expectations.